


Spotted: Racism At UofT stickers posted around campus!
We are a group interested in exposing systemic racism at U of T and other institutions around the world. We hope to create a blog that not only educates society on the ever pervasive nature of racism but also disrupts our comfort and compliance in its perpetuation. Sincerely, Concerned Students.



Many of us who are familiar with UofT campus and walk around it avidly are probably aware of the underpass that works as a separation between Wellesley Street West/Queens Park Circle and Hart House Circle. On the walls of this underpass lies a large mural which represents the figures which are considered the highest heights of classical knowledge. Renderings of Aristotle, Plato and a Madonna-esque figure are displayed in heavenly glory, their bodies hovering above the sidewalk, wrapped in loose regal cloth and faces marked with wisdom and benevolence. Among this overtly sentimental ode to classicism walks the figure of what was clearly meant to indicate the average University of Toronto student. Why, it’s nothing less than the perfect example of the all-Canadian Varsity student! The figure was originally presented as a white young male with dirty blonde hair, wearing a UofT Blues Varsity Jacket and rocking blue jeans.
However some may resist the urge to be so quick as to question such a mural. Why is it problematic? Some may provide the quick answer that this mural was painted long ago (the jacket worn by the student suggests a mere 14 years old), and that was the reality then. Others may suggest that it is simply artistic expression while some may simply respond, “who cares?”
And yet…there has been an outcry- a refusal of acceptance to what is deemed to be the “average”, although it is a covert refusal. Fairly recently, I have discovered that there has been a slow but continuous resistance to the depiction as reflective of the University of Toronto experience. In early spring 2008, I noticed the word “Eurocentrism” was scrawled onto the white spaces of the depiction. Later still, the head and hands of the figure in the jacket were transformed from the happy white male to an unsatisfied, longer haired black one. A few months after a thought bubble containing the phrase “decolonize this shit” was added. Recently, I noticed the figure of Huey Newton (co-founder and leader of the Black Panther movement) had been spray painted onto the entry of the underpass.
So, what does this mean? Firstly, large portions of St. George campus are bodies of colour. Also, lack of acknowledgement to this fact is an act of oppression. Further more, the knowledge that is idealized within Humanities comes from European high culture. You may ask, “What’s wrong with that?” I would respond that any monolithic idealization of a single culture is problematic in a society that claims to be all-inclusive and equitable. So, while we are ingesting the proclamation that equity and valuing of all practices and knowledge are important to certain institutions of learning, why is it that bodies of colour feel suppressed in a way that cannot be communicated and dealt with more easily and openly? Perhaps we should be more apt to questioning the valuing of culture and knowledge in institutions of higher learning and really look to see who possesses visibility and power on campus apart from tokenism…


The duo donned what can only be described as brownface. Their costumes were tinted brown to give them darker skin and tried to paint their faces and bodies with what Russia perceives as traditional Aboriginal warpaint.
Aboriginals in Australia and North America responded with cries of outrage and the Russian duo not only apologized but removed the offensive brownface paint and tinted costumes from their routine.
This brings us back to our issue with the University of Toronto's lack of response to the blackface incident. The students made a poor decision in wearing blackface to a costume party, but the lack of an apology or action by the school is the real issue.
If the Russian skaters can understand, apologize and attempt to rectify the situation as best they can, why can't U of T? Instead of trying to hold a forum explaining the racist history of blackface, in an attempt to educate those who are ignorant to it, they turned their backs. instead of supporting the BSA who was trying to hold a forum, they took credit for it and silenced the BSA.
Well done U of T, you just got a lesson in sympathy by Russian skaters.
We as a collective are interested in creating a social disturbance around the normalization of racial terror and white hegemony. We have begun our work around the manifestations of blackface, theatrical make-up with a long history of racism. Blackface is also the term we are using to reference a very recent occurrence of racial insensitivity that played out on our campus.
On October 29th, 2009, five men wore racialized dress to a Halloween costume party thrown by three University of Toronto colleges. Their reported portrayal of the Jamaican bobsled team included covering themselves in brown foundation, with one member wearing white makeup, as well as shirts displaying the slogan “100% Jamaican”. Their costume also appeared on a “best costumes of the night” list distributed by SMCSU (St. Mike’s College Student Union). The University of Toronto Black Student Association (BSA) organized a space (dubbed “Manifestations of Blackface: A Town Hall Meeting”) to discuss the problematic nature of the costume as well as its encouragement by those that threw the party. What followed was a very emotional, and at points hateful, discussion with solidarity remaining out of grasp. No students were reprimanded for their racism and the SMCSU moved their office away from the BSA’s office in an attempt to ostracize the organization for creating an outcry. A “blame the victim” mentality was adopted during the town hall meeting and black students were condemned for causing trouble. The University of Toronto has done nothing to fix the problem and the BSA and other student groups have been banned from discussing the matter further for fear of backlash.
We initially wanted to host an educational forum on campus but were warned there could be severe consequences. Subsequently we have chosen to remain anonymous by starting this blog thus protecting ourselves and our academic careers.
The University of Toronto does not understand that this is merely another example of an ongoing systemic problem. By looking at the seemingly unconscious acceptance of hegemony in a sphere expected to engage in critical thought, we hope to uncover why there is a lack of accountability on the part of the University of Toronto administration.